Could someone explain why "Cardiac catheterization with stent placement" is incorrect?
My thought process was that this guy has an occlusion of his RCA --> knocking out his AV node --> 3rd degree AV block. Also his pulse is 40 which suggest a RCA infarction as well.
The reason I went with this is because he got to the hospital within 30 minutes and they put this information first and made it seem important. If his RCA could be opened up, then the damage could be reversible.
I get the pacemaker, but first I feel like you would attempt to unocclude the vessel and give it some integrity.
First 2 heart blocks --> NO TREATMENT (1st degree and 2nd degree Mobitz type I)
Last 2 heart blocks --> PACEMAKER (2nd degree Mobitz type II and 3rd degree)
submitted by โmattnatomy(46)
A Pacemaker is the correct treatment for 3rd degree AV block. Makes it so the atria and ventricles beat in sync.