share email twitter ⋅ join discord whatsapp(2ck)
Free 120  NBME 24  NBME 23  NBME 22  NBME 21  NBME 20  NBME 19  NBME 18  NBME 17  NBME 16  NBME 15  NBME 13 
introducing : the “predict me” score predictor NEW!
Welcome to tulsigabbard’s page.
Contributor score: 7


Comments ...




Subcomments ...

submitted by sympathetikey(1350),
unscramble the site ⋅ remove ads ⋅ become a member ($39/month)

erP AF (.pg 6)36: nnCgoircne aserbt .cec..arn

"lfiiaAmtcponivoxes/oeirsrnep of eeo goe/grtnornessrtpe esorcpetr ro brBe2c- EHR,2( GaEF n )rrepecto is nmom;co ER ⊝, RP ,⊝ na2 uRnedH/E ⊝ rmof omre gasieeg.svr"

sympathetikey  FA 2019 +4  
meningitis  Why others not it: Anticipation: Trinucleotide repeats; CAG (Huntington), CTG (Myotonic dyst), GAA (ataxia telangiectasia), CGG(Fragile X) Chromosomal rearrangement: Many but can think of Trisomy 21, BCR-Abl, etc Imprinting: Prader willi, angelman Loss of heterozygosity: loss of a single parent's contribution to part of its genome. A common occurrence in cancer, it often indicates the presence of tumor suppressor gene in the lost region. +1  
kai  trinucleotide repeats are not associated with breast cancer Neither are chromosomal rearrangements BRCA1,2 tumor supressor genes are associated with breast cancer, which is why I chose E, but I guess I should have bought the new First Aid.......... +  
charcot_bouchard  GAA is Freidrich Ataxia +4  
tulsigabbard  So is the amplification of the receptors unrelated to BRCA 1, 2? I'm still stuck on this as Sketchy states that breast cancer falls under the "two-hit" model. +  
tallerthanmymom  @tulsigabbard I think one of the keys here is the question stem; " what is the most likely cause of the OVERexpression in this pts tumor cells?" --> I think that the "2-Hit" model would lead to UNDERexpression of a tumor suppression gene rather than overexpression. Whereas amplification would cause OVERexpression of the HER2/estrogen and progesterone receptors. But, I don't think that amplification would be the answer if they were asking about a triple negative cancer. +1  
tallerthanmymom  Also this is on page 632 of FA 2018 for those using that version +  
tulsigabbard  @tallerthanmymom - thank you! +  
drzed  I can understand why @tulsigabbard dropped out of the race--she's taking step 1 soon LOL +1  


unscramble the site ⋅ remove ads ⋅ become a member ($39/month)

von dinebrWlal esaesid is by arf teh stom ooncmm ehiitnder ibegendl tae.isdhis r,etnuqeFyl teh olyn aaylrobort aoryianlmtb si arisdncee gbdinele imet rlli(ytael uyo kipcr hte pieatnt adn ees hwo lngo it aekts etmh ot opts d.blinge)e On ,eSpt dilbeeng weomn vhea VD.W Bnleiged sboy vaeh malhipoieh.

winelover777  Agree. PTT does not have to be elevated to be VWD. +5  
tulsigabbard  Welp. +  
tekkenman101  Except there's no laboratory verified bleeding time given, only aggregation which has to do with platelet-platelet interaction. +  


submitted by aesalmon(83),
unscramble the site ⋅ remove ads ⋅ become a member ($39/month)

I fele umbd fro nkigas ubt nca onesome lxapine ish?t fI sih tarnpes rea fo seclo ot orlnma IBM dan era denroncce uatob shi wtgehi hwy wodul eyth eb gwlolain sih oliacre itmnousocpn ot xceeed ish rgynee xintue?erdep ( AAK eitlntg het ikd ate too mhcu nad tno iexeercs eounhg)

meningitis  That's a modern day mystery. +16  
drdoom  The prompt is only asking "what's the likely cause of obesity?" It's not that they're "allowing" him to eat more than exercise. (Few parents can monitor their kids that closely!) The prompt is only asking what's the most likely explanation for his 95th percentile weight and BMI (given that he otherwise appears normal); in the United States, the most likely explanation is eating way more than you expend. +1  
niboonsh  aka 'merica #firstworldproblems +4  
makinallkindzofgainz  If you are obese, it's because you have consumed calories in excess of your energy expenditure, end of story. (there are factors that affect your energy expenditure, but the simple statement is 100% true, unless you want to argue against the laws of thermodynamics). A is the only correct answer. +1  
tulsigabbard  This answer hit too close to home. +4  
castlblack  I think the reason they point out the average weight of the parents is because leptin disorders are inherited. It helps you eliminate that answer choice. +1  


submitted by marbledoc(0),
unscramble the site ⋅ remove ads ⋅ become a member ($39/month)

yhW dulow uyo ask hte pnatite to inftydei het spor adn nocs? I nd’to get eht rapcapho ee!rh

someduck3  There was a question about this in Uworld. for *stubborn* patients who are "not ready to quit" just yet you use the motivational approach. The technique acronym is OARS: Open ended questions, Affirmation, Reflect, Summarize. +6  
yotsubato  Additionally the guy himself says "I know smoking is bad for me" Like he knows its bad, he doesnt care, but give him nicotine replacement and maybe he'll quit... +5  
usmleuser007  I didn't think nicotine replacement was a good answer choice b/c if he isn't ready to quit then why would he agree to use alternatives. +  
usmleuser007  People who smoke and are addicted like the feel of the cigs and environmental ques. Using replacements would be more challenging. The second best answer choice would have been Rx. +  
titanesxvi  why not detail the long-therm health effects of smoking? +  
seracen  @ titanesxvi: I assume because they always like the most "open ended" response. If you start detailing the long term effects, the patient might interpret that as attempting to convince, and might resist or feel pressured. By having the patient elucidate what they consider pros and cons, you allow it to be an open discussion. +  
suckitnbme  Also because the patient states he already knows smoking hurts him in the long run so it may come off as lecturing on something he already knows. I view this as what is the least-judgmental way to facilitate the patient moving on to the next step of the stages of change model largely of their own volition. +2  
usmlehulk  i choose the option c which is initiate a pulmunary function test. why is that a wrong choice? +2  
makinallkindzofgainz  @usmlehulk - he's asymptomatic, knows it is not good for him in the long run, but is not quite ready to make a change. It is best to talk with him about the pros/cons of cessation so that maybe he will make the decision to quit smoking soon. Ordering a pulmonary function test is not going to be useful. Let's say it's decreased. Ok, so what? It doesn't change management in this patient right now. +1  
rainlad  Think of it as motivational interviewing +1  
tulsigabbard  Still don't like the answer given that the patient already stated that he knows that it can do him harm in the long run. It seems like overkill. +3  


submitted by sympathetikey(1350),
unscramble the site ⋅ remove ads ⋅ become a member ($39/month)

ePr AF .p(g )36:6 regoinnncC ebtsra .nc.c.are

"namoiflicpitArxesvor/noiseep fo en/ogtpnssroree teeogr orepctser ro cBe2b-r E,(H2R GnFEa roetcerp) si cnmmo;o RE ,⊝ PR ,⊝ EuaR2den Hn/ ⊝ fomr remo .rgasg"vseie

sympathetikey  FA 2019 +4  
meningitis  Why others not it: Anticipation: Trinucleotide repeats; CAG (Huntington), CTG (Myotonic dyst), GAA (ataxia telangiectasia), CGG(Fragile X) Chromosomal rearrangement: Many but can think of Trisomy 21, BCR-Abl, etc Imprinting: Prader willi, angelman Loss of heterozygosity: loss of a single parent's contribution to part of its genome. A common occurrence in cancer, it often indicates the presence of tumor suppressor gene in the lost region. +1  
kai  trinucleotide repeats are not associated with breast cancer Neither are chromosomal rearrangements BRCA1,2 tumor supressor genes are associated with breast cancer, which is why I chose E, but I guess I should have bought the new First Aid.......... +  
charcot_bouchard  GAA is Freidrich Ataxia +4  
tulsigabbard  So is the amplification of the receptors unrelated to BRCA 1, 2? I'm still stuck on this as Sketchy states that breast cancer falls under the "two-hit" model. +  
tallerthanmymom  @tulsigabbard I think one of the keys here is the question stem; " what is the most likely cause of the OVERexpression in this pts tumor cells?" --> I think that the "2-Hit" model would lead to UNDERexpression of a tumor suppression gene rather than overexpression. Whereas amplification would cause OVERexpression of the HER2/estrogen and progesterone receptors. But, I don't think that amplification would be the answer if they were asking about a triple negative cancer. +1  
tallerthanmymom  Also this is on page 632 of FA 2018 for those using that version +  
tulsigabbard  @tallerthanmymom - thank you! +  
drzed  I can understand why @tulsigabbard dropped out of the race--she's taking step 1 soon LOL +1