share email twitter ⋅ join discord whatsapp(2ck)
Free 120  NBME 24  NBME 23  NBME 22  NBME 21  NBME 20  NBME 19  NBME 18  NBME 17  NBME 16  NBME 15  NBME 13 
introducing : the “predict me” score predictor NEW!
Welcome to seracen’s page.
Contributor score: 13

Comments ...

 +4  (nbme22#41)
unscramble the site ⋅ remove ads ⋅ become a member ($39/month)

alCcssi AF M:nnemoci

1S-1S kBleuc my oSeh L3fLo-t(4 )o cKki teh rooD )(C6 5l-geC kcPi up tksicS iC8C7)c-eb(p yaL ehmt igrShtat t)cr(ipe

I wkno st'i a frlxee ei,mnmcno btu its' ervsed em lwel in etehs sotrs of .stnuioeqs

 +1  (nbme22#9)
unscramble the site ⋅ remove ads ⋅ become a member ($39/month)

Ug,h rr,oys ngtetig edsu ot teh ifra,gotmtn nda nytaclaclied odetps it in eth owrng .calpe

a,synywA ot tter,eeira I aslywa juts olok at the nutis. It anwst ,/Limn I'm vgine 2^mc nad ce/msc

So I iutlm,ylp ot tge voleum tuo fo ti )cm,(3^ enth toevrnc cdoenss ot sie.tmnu

,uhsT ist' sallbcyia 622x,x in mseo shaep ro omrf aetfr laigncp the dliamecs .plryetrappaoi dooG tnghi ehyt idtd'n dad hatt lairpatrcu wlreikn, Ill' eakt ym diemeral tamh lkslis and ugb t,uo a.ha.h.

Subcomments ...

submitted by marbledoc(0),
unscramble the site ⋅ remove ads ⋅ become a member ($39/month)

hyW dwoul oyu sak eth pttniea to fiednyti eht psor adn on?sc I ’tdno egt eth parcpaoh e!rhe

someduck3  There was a question about this in Uworld. for *stubborn* patients who are "not ready to quit" just yet you use the motivational approach. The technique acronym is OARS: Open ended questions, Affirmation, Reflect, Summarize. +6  
yotsubato  Additionally the guy himself says "I know smoking is bad for me" Like he knows its bad, he doesnt care, but give him nicotine replacement and maybe he'll quit... +5  
usmleuser007  I didn't think nicotine replacement was a good answer choice b/c if he isn't ready to quit then why would he agree to use alternatives. +  
usmleuser007  People who smoke and are addicted like the feel of the cigs and environmental ques. Using replacements would be more challenging. The second best answer choice would have been Rx. +  
titanesxvi  why not detail the long-therm health effects of smoking? +  
seracen  @ titanesxvi: I assume because they always like the most "open ended" response. If you start detailing the long term effects, the patient might interpret that as attempting to convince, and might resist or feel pressured. By having the patient elucidate what they consider pros and cons, you allow it to be an open discussion. +  
suckitnbme  Also because the patient states he already knows smoking hurts him in the long run so it may come off as lecturing on something he already knows. I view this as what is the least-judgmental way to facilitate the patient moving on to the next step of the stages of change model largely of their own volition. +2  
usmlehulk  i choose the option c which is initiate a pulmunary function test. why is that a wrong choice? +2  
makinallkindzofgainz  @usmlehulk - he's asymptomatic, knows it is not good for him in the long run, but is not quite ready to make a change. It is best to talk with him about the pros/cons of cessation so that maybe he will make the decision to quit smoking soon. Ordering a pulmonary function test is not going to be useful. Let's say it's decreased. Ok, so what? It doesn't change management in this patient right now. +1  
rainlad  Think of it as motivational interviewing +1  
tulsigabbard  Still don't like the answer given that the patient already stated that he knows that it can do him harm in the long run. It seems like overkill. +3  

submitted by fallot4logy(10),
unscramble the site ⋅ remove ads ⋅ become a member ($39/month)

ywh otn a1u mc?sasoosoi.drrtiihed sartthrii kile mvesksotn.n.p3i s..2iy oiyet yu.dmsl isetsosri si a bti lronaisvrctoe

seracen  I usually look for the hilar manifestation, when considering sarcoidosis, or the skin manifestations. Personally, I thought Sjogren's when I read this. +1  
peridot  @seracen I can see why you thought Sjogren, but I think Sjogren would have more emphasis on dryness of mucus membranes and eyes (technically the question stem does say "anterior chamber of the eye", but Sjogren is more like the surface of the eye so "anterior chamber" is a weird way to put it - usually that refers more to uveitis). Also, choroid plexus (whether that refers to eye or brain... tbh idk about that yet), but either way, doesn't really fit Sjogren. Kidney involvement is also rather rare with that I believe. +1  

unscramble the site ⋅ remove ads ⋅ become a member ($39/month)

I tup cnpnoitotasi eeubsca I gthohut eth mdcationei enbgi secbidred ighmt eb :CBC nac sonemeo alnxipe ywh rasteint evro C?BC

seracen  Wouldn't nitrates be a faster acting drug here? That was my take-away anyway. One is more acute, the other for long term maintenance. +4  
suckitnbme  I also believe it's because CCBs have minimal effect on venous beds and would not cause a significant decrease on preload. +3  
beto  decrease of cardiac preload is another word of Venodilation, so Nitrates primarly venodilators. CCB dilate arteria more than veins +1  
zevvyt  also, verapamil is the one that causes constipation. But Verampamil is non-dyhydropiridine, so it works more on the heart than the vessels +3