share email twitter ⋅ join discord whatsapp(2ck)
Free 120  NBME 24  NBME 23  NBME 22  NBME 21  NBME 20  NBME 19  NBME 18  NBME 17  NBME 16  NBME 15  NBME 13 
introducing : the “predict me” score predictor NEW!
Welcome to rainlad’s page.
Contributor score: 23

Comments ...

 +2  (nbme22#11)

The other answer choices:

motor innervation to the bulbocavernosus muscle = deep/muscular branch of the perineal nerve, which is branch of the pudendal nerve

motor innervation to the lower portion of the rectus abdominis muscle = thoraco-abdominal nerves, which are continuations of the T7-T11 intercostal nerves

sensation from the dorsal surface of the penis = dorsal nerve of the penis, which is the deepest division of the pudendal nerve

 -1  (nbme22#16)

How do you rule out Protein C deficiency in this case? doesn't that also increase risk of thrombosis and miscarriage?

suckitnbme  @rainlad Protein C deficiency doesn't cause elevated PT and aPTT. I believe they're both normal and assays for the disease measure protein C activity. +4
drzed  Protein C is an anti-coagulant, so if you lack factor C, then you have MORE clotting factors. This means that the PT and PTT would not be prolonged. +3

 +3  (nbme24#35)

I was thrown off because I didn't realize lower motoneuron = lower motor neuron face palm

"LMN deficits... dysarthria, dysphagia, asymmetric limb weakness, fasciculations, atrophy

UMN deficits... pseudobulbar palsy (i.e. dysarthria, dysphagia, emotional lability, spastic gait, clonus])"

-- FA 2019 p.518

 +10  (nbme23#12)
unscramble the site ⋅ remove ads ⋅ become a member ($39/month)

ym paahcrop ot this nouqetsi aws to ialtenmei lal het aswern cceisho htta edmtnonei pciseciftyi ro vnetsi,ysiit ncise het tdaa ereh did nto predovi omfainnroti abuto ayn rsto of nciresgne t.set

hatt eftl me wiht owt spesobli nwresa coseic:h I nlmaiedtie hte eon tuoba soniycncste of otehr etisd,us cnsie no oetrh estduis weer tndmoieen in eht tenoqsiu t.esm

ont esur fi I ipdeifmriolsve ,hingst btu it lde me ot the girth !swerna

makinallkindzofgainz  this is exactly how I reasoned through it. Were we correct in our line of thinking? We'll never knooooow +
qball  But will you ever know on the real thing? +1
drdoom  but will you ever know in real life? you may do the right thing (given time constraints, & information available), but outcome is bad; maybe you do the wrong thing, but the outcome is good (despite your decision). how to know the difference? +3

 +0  (nbme21#12)
unscramble the site ⋅ remove ads ⋅ become a member ($39/month)

How do ew lxpneai het uibtr in thsi aes?c sAol why t'nis ti telf ytrear ras?neyum Taht mssee keli it uldow breett aplnixe eth utirb

gdupgrant  The bruit is basically just turbulent flow, which is most commonly caused by artery narrowing. I was just reading on renal artery aneurysm and it looks like most of the hypertension is actually related to a pre aneurysm stenosis, so i think stenosis is the "better" answer, esp. since the pt has like every risk factor for stenosis. To be honest I had not ever really thought about RAA for this case because bruit over RA has been drilled into my head as renal artery stenosis, but i apprecaite seeing how this is a super reasonable answer - just the stenosis is "more likely" +1

 +4  (nbme21#38)
unscramble the site ⋅ remove ads ⋅ become a member ($39/month)

wloud ew be oerdiwr oatub ngsiu FGCS- negiv atht he has taeuc kemuaeli? odwlu ti mttlisuae oghtwr of ish nacrce e?slcl

suckitnbme  I think we're assuming that we eradicated the leukemia with the chemo. However at the same time a lot of normal stem cells were also killed off so we give GCSF to help recovery especially since they have an infection. +

 +1  (nbme20#37)
unscramble the site ⋅ remove ads ⋅ become a member ($39/month)

mH,hrocilyopce yeokacpihlm mtebaiolc kllsasoai si het alcssic eolytetrelc and d-bieaasc bcalmaine of riocply ns.tessio

nrssetietP invmgtoi lusrets ni ssol of l.HC eTh hocdlrei lsso ustlser ni a wol olbod hrdicleo evell wihch irpimas het dnkse'yi ibyltai ot teercxe abcireb.anot Thsi is teh aotrcf ttah tersnpev oecinrotrc fo eht ikaalslos lndgiea ot licmbateo

A sryonacde ynrsmelotaroidphes eedvopsl ude ot eth eerdesacd olodb vlom.ue eTh hihg dreastenloo veelsl suacse the ndsiyek to rnitea +Na t(o rorccet eth rsviltnacuraa uomvel e)iolntpd,e adn eeerxtc rcneaiesd otnausm fo K+ tnoi hte eiurn trgsnu(lei in a wol bdloo leelv fo tsp.a)iomus

Subcomments ...

submitted by sympathetikey(1376),
unscramble the site ⋅ remove ads ⋅ become a member ($39/month)

liidlmefSet- asdeeis oefnt ogfwlnilo a e-liukfl lssleni e,g( arvil yitnf M)a.ocnei eb teihdrpohyry raeyl in cer,ous ldwfeloo yb tyhosdihorypmi rep(ntmane in 1~5% fo seac)s. yeVr ndeetr ytirodh si

sympathetikey  Short time course & tenderness was a tip for me. +10  
rainlad  Aka de Quervain's thyroiditis +  

submitted by i-de-liver(3),
unscramble the site ⋅ remove ads ⋅ become a member ($39/month)

Deso oaenny onkw yhw tshi si ircU ciAd ton .N orarghoen? llA I see ni eht cgmiprraho rea prehti.sonlu sI ttah ewiht lein ni het imddel of eht ctiuper ttah loevysra hte ymhylcepot eodppssu ot be het pla-dshneedee ruic cadi? rO is it subaece hs'se an dol layd dan uyualls sceitp hsAtiritr si rmfo S. eAuurs, so it lowud erom keil yb riuc dcai dna nto agnerohor csnie es'hs dlo?re

maverick95  I struggled between those two answer choices as well. I thought that the large needle shape right in the middle was a uric acid crystal which helped push me towards Uric Acid as my answer. I also took into account that she was older (even though STIs are rampant among the elderly) she didn't really seem to have any other symptoms or history of STI/gonorrhea. I figured with her age that she just wasn't able to excrete Uric Acid enough, and got a gout. Something a pathologist told me one time was that they put the focus of the picture in the middle of the shot. So considering the uric acid-looking shape was right in the middle, I figured that's what they wanted us to focus on with the picture. Hope this helps. +12  
i-de-liver  Ah gotcha! I guess I shouldn't have thought that the thing in the middle was an artifact lol... thank you!! +2  
a1913  I believe it's because: 1) there is nothing given that would be risk factors for this woman to have N. gonorrhea 2) The thing in the middle is indeed an MSU crystal, just not under polarized light 3) apparently we get acute inflammation and increase in WBCs with crystal-induced arthropathies, per Table 11-2 on page 8 here (10 page document, top of page of interest will say p. 260) --> Also take a look at the pics on the previous page, left column for an example. I got this wrong as well, but I definitely won't again! lol +4  
cr  i had the same problem, Whats about the fever?, could be present in gout? +1  
rainlad  I think this question mentioned the patient's temp was 100.4 which is consistent with mild fever in gout from inflammation. This photo was wack though +  
t123  The damage in gout is mediated by Neutrophils, so makes complete sense you see a bunch. +3  

unscramble the site ⋅ remove ads ⋅ become a member ($39/month)

esncIread twsae dna +Na ocnirntanteco oudlhs nitop ot ctcsyi issfbori )FC(. heT rlopebm wtih CF si ton taht the eneg si igenb sicerbrntda ,sels utb hatt teh eprtnoi that eth gnee decso ofr is reda,tle wchih easld ot teh FC hlanenc nibeg aedreddg ude to lgmnfosi-di ;>-- essl CF rcsroetpe no clel arufces g;&t-- hnpcyptoei F.C

ls3076  why not membrane receptor? +7  
a1913  delF508 is a 3 base pair deletion of phenylalanine at amino acid position 508. Mutation causes impaired post-translational processing of CFTR (improper folding) which rough ER detects. Sends mutant misfolded CFTR to the proteasome for degradation, preventing it from reaching cell surface. So problem is not malfunctioning CFTR channels in the surface; problem is complete absence of CFTR on cell surface (since they keep getting misfolded and sent to proteasome to be trashed). Source of primary problem: error in protein structure +7  
angelaq11  @Is3076 because the CFTR is a channel not a receptor. +17  
rainlad  FA 2019 p. 60 +  
dysdiadochokinesia  @a1913 is correct- as for @angelaq11, you can still have a receptor that also functions as a channel as they are not mutually exclusive. An example of this is the nAChR found on postsynaptic NMJ neurons. This is a non-selective, ligand-gated, ionotropic receptor that functions as a channel once its ligand (i.e., ACh) has bound to the active site to induce conformational change. Similarly on the same realm: CFTR is an ionotropic receptor that concurrently functions as a Cl- channel once its ligands (ie. 2 ATP) is bound to open the channel and enable Cl- flux. This question in particular is asking for the underlying pathophysiologic mechanism for cystic fibrosis, which boils down to an issue with the primary structure of a protein resulting in its misfolding and subsequent sequestration/degradation. +1  

submitted by marbledoc(0),
unscramble the site ⋅ remove ads ⋅ become a member ($39/month)

Wyh lwdou uyo ksa eth ptaietn ot dneyifti het rsop dan oc?sn I nd’to get hte oaarphpc !eehr

someduck3  There was a question about this in Uworld. for *stubborn* patients who are "not ready to quit" just yet you use the motivational approach. The technique acronym is OARS: Open ended questions, Affirmation, Reflect, Summarize. +6  
yotsubato  Additionally the guy himself says "I know smoking is bad for me" Like he knows its bad, he doesnt care, but give him nicotine replacement and maybe he'll quit... +5  
usmleuser007  I didn't think nicotine replacement was a good answer choice b/c if he isn't ready to quit then why would he agree to use alternatives. +  
usmleuser007  People who smoke and are addicted like the feel of the cigs and environmental ques. Using replacements would be more challenging. The second best answer choice would have been Rx. +  
titanesxvi  why not detail the long-therm health effects of smoking? +  
seracen  @ titanesxvi: I assume because they always like the most "open ended" response. If you start detailing the long term effects, the patient might interpret that as attempting to convince, and might resist or feel pressured. By having the patient elucidate what they consider pros and cons, you allow it to be an open discussion. +  
suckitnbme  Also because the patient states he already knows smoking hurts him in the long run so it may come off as lecturing on something he already knows. I view this as what is the least-judgmental way to facilitate the patient moving on to the next step of the stages of change model largely of their own volition. +2  
usmlehulk  i choose the option c which is initiate a pulmunary function test. why is that a wrong choice? +2  
makinallkindzofgainz  @usmlehulk - he's asymptomatic, knows it is not good for him in the long run, but is not quite ready to make a change. It is best to talk with him about the pros/cons of cessation so that maybe he will make the decision to quit smoking soon. Ordering a pulmonary function test is not going to be useful. Let's say it's decreased. Ok, so what? It doesn't change management in this patient right now. +1  
rainlad  Think of it as motivational interviewing +1  
tulsigabbard  Still don't like the answer given that the patient already stated that he knows that it can do him harm in the long run. It seems like overkill. +3  

submitted by neonem(572),
unscramble the site ⋅ remove ads ⋅ become a member ($39/month)

siht intepta hsa cmttmsapoyi rctoia ns.seitos isTh can eb teediidfni by eth nlrutrcieav yetphhprroy ot( ntacepoesm orf cednerias fncounatil rldtfaeao form tin-olnmncaop ctario evlva), issimdtolcy urmurm adn teh oacolnti ta teh rmalon traico

Per eoDpTaUt no Cinlacli temfnantsoiias of itcorA sSe:ontis

sz"Dinzsie nad onpsecy — ySnepco corucs sa a egrpnienst ommtyps ni ypextirlpaaom 01 erptcen of staeitnp iwht mtyopmitasc esreve AS o(r toperlipxaamy 3 repcetn of lal atntseip hwit reesve SA) .[]3 eheTr era revasle sporpdoe npetilanasox rof oeixltaenr siszeznid ep(rs)eocpny ro soncyep in tpseiant ithw ,SA hotb fo iwhhc lreftce escdeerda laebcrer rfopesn.iu cdeeedEiucxrs-in vsantiildaoo in teh neesepcr fo na tnbuiosrcot htiw dfxei driccaa tupout cna luesrt in psnio.onyeht"

guillo12  What does "fixed cardiac output" signify? +1  
usmleuser007  "fixed cardiac output" might mean that with the stenosis (ie. narrowed aortic valve) there is a limited or rather reduced cardiac output. Exercise would not increase cardiac output because the stenosis is caused by a mechanical (physical) rather than a biochemical process. Therefore, At any given moment the heart can not increase its output no matter how forcefully it contracts. +8  
fallot4logy  why not option A?arterial compression ? +3  
sunshinesweetheart  @fallot4logy LVH does not lead to coronary artery compression. only reallyyyy rarely will pulmonary artery dilation cause coronary artery compression. plus that would cause angina but probably wouldnt decrease cerebral bloodflow to syncope. her murmur + LVH point us toward aortic stenosis which does cause those --> fixed CO +2  
drpatinoire  @fallot4logy LVH can cause coronary artery compression, but typically leading to coronary ischemia after exercise (i.e. stable angina in this patient). The question is asking what leads to her syncope. Syncope actually means her brain is lacking blood supply abruptly. +5  
rainlad  how do we rule out mitral valve prolapse in this case? +  
spow  @rainlad murmurs at the right upper sternal border are aortic in nature. Mitral murmurs are heard at left 5th intercostal at the midaxillary line. +1  
jj375  Also, nobody mentioned the "prominent left ventricular impulse". I kinda get thrown off by these. Anyone have thoughts? Google was telling me it is from a hypertrophied ventricle so I'm thinking her aortic stenosis causes the LV hypertrophy and an impulse. Is this the correct line of thinking? +  

submitted by sheesher(-1),
unscramble the site ⋅ remove ads ⋅ become a member ($39/month)

I'm agsimusn ahtt euacbes onbiaecarbt si d,cesredae ihts hsa ot be mlcitaeob doisicas esaudc yb maezloiaadct?e Msiesd tish quotneis seuaecb I wsa goonikl rof icamlotbe iidassoc (ernaeisdc iarbteacobn) cdueas yb a oplo rtd.c.iiue.

sympathetikey  I don't think so. I know that K+ levels decrease with laxative use, due to dehydration, which activates the RAAS, which increased aldosterone, which cause Na+ re-absorption and K+ wasting. Aldosterone also causes the alpha intercalated cells to secrete more H+ into the urine, which causes a serum alkalosis. Therefore, in order to correct that, bicarb re-absorption decreases in the kidneys, which brings the pH closer to normal. As far as Chloride, I guess that must be re-absorbed with Na+ due to it being negatively charged (?). That's the one thing I'm not sure about. +5  
aknemu  I think what they are getting at is that it is Diarrhea--> Non-anion gap metabolic acidosis (HARDASS). This would mean that HCO3- would be low and chloride would be high (in non-anion gap acidosis the chloride increases and that's why you don't have a gap). +5  
2zanzibar  Normally, stool's electrolyte content primarily consists of bicarb, potassium, and sodium. Since the colon reclaims sodium in exchange for potassium, the potassium content of stool is usually double that of sodium. Most of our bicarb loss in stool actually occurs through the loss of organic acid anions, i.e. bicarb that's been titrated by the organic acids formed by bacterial fermentation in the colon (e.g. lactic acid). *Bottom line: our stool is alkaline, with mostly bicarb and potassium.* Diarrhea is a cause of *NON-anion gap metabolic acidosis* due to bicarb loss in the stool. We aren't adding any acids to the mix -- we're simply losing anions -- which is why our anion gap remains normal. Potassium goes along for the ride and we end up with *hypokalemic* metabolic acidosis. And because we're losing anions, we want to compensate by *increasing retention of Cl-*. **Anion gap = Na+ - [Cl- + HCO3-]** +3  
rainlad  another observation to support this: The patient's RR is 30/min, which demonstrates a compensatory respiratory alkalosis, in response to the non-anion gap metabolic acidosis +1  

submitted by hello(317),
unscramble the site ⋅ remove ads ⋅ become a member ($39/month)

hyw is apalsm tncooic sesrpuer ?rngow

rainlad  I think it's because we would expect to see some more proteinuria/albuminuria if the plasma oncotic pressure had increased to compensate +1  

submitted by seagull(1583),
unscramble the site ⋅ remove ads ⋅ become a member ($39/month)

Thsi si a pinca cka.att aiynenirtolvHpet srpdo OpC2 ingedal to a prrtyiraseo a.skllosia 2op is raeivtylel fnefcdteua t(do'n sak em wo?)h

sympathetikey  Yeah haha I had the same conundrum. +  
sajaqua1  If she's breathing deep as she breathes fast, then oxygen is still reaching the alveoli , so arterial pO2 would not be effected. +23  
imnotarobotbut  lmao i'm so freaking dumb i thought she was having alcohol withdrawals because it was relieved by alcohol +2  
soph  Maybe Po2 is unaffected bc its perfusion (blood) limited not difusion limited (under normal circumstances). +2  
charcot_bouchard  PErioral tingling- due to transient hypocalcemia induced by resp alkalosis. +1  
rainlad  I believe CO2 diffuses ~20x faster than O2, so increases in her respiratory rate have more effect on her PCO2 than her PO2 +1  
usmile1  adding onto Charcot_bouchards comment, I found this: Respiratory alkalosis secondary to hyperventilation is probably the most common cause of acute ionised hypocalcaemia. Binding between calcium and protein is enhanced when serum pH increases, resulting in decreased ionised calcium. Respiratory alkalosis can induce secondary hypocalcaemia that may cause cardiac arrhythmias, conduction abnormalities and various somatic symptoms such as paraesthesia, PErioral numbness, hyperreflexia, convulsive disorders, muscle spasm and tetany. +3