oS teh tesb i ludco ifnd aws ni Ftirs idA 1920 pg 643 duenr eacbiDti aeiotKds.cios eTh eapgremyhcyli and pkhyliramaee uasce na imoscto sueidirs so the nereit ybod etsg pdeldtee fo dfuisl. ceHen ywh trpa fo the etermttan orf DKA is VI fsu.ldi uYo himgt vnee yelr no that peeci of rmiinoatofn noeal to weasrn thsi setio,qun hatt DKA si ttdaree wiht VI u.sfldi
a little messed up, but "Inability of neurons to perform glycolysis" seems like a tempting answer. But the reality is, the neurons are able to perform glycolysis, they ready to rock but just waiting on insulin. I still chose this as my answer tho.
I guess this is one of those choose the best answer questions. I think FA should add the reasoning behind cerebral edema, being that it's a major cause of death (but I couldn't find it in Robbins either). Having so much glucose in the blood vessels causes water to be drawn out (ICF --> ECF). So that's a intracellular dehydration.
Idk how you could say that it's from extracellular dehydration, but whatever I guess.
asys ttah ryalopshtemroyi nda socsadii telra lmtnae .autsst
whihc csrrletoae tiwh the rtihg weasnr
s.p i otg it wogrn oto :)