radzio1in FA p203 it literally says Protease Inhibitors act by inhibiting maturation and assembly. So thats what I picked. Why is protein processing more appropriate? +2
radzio1in FA p203 it literally says Protease Inhibitors act by inhibiting maturation and assembly. So thats what I picked. Why is protein processing more appropriate? +
kafmaybe packaging means sending out of the cell?+
pakimdon pg 203 of first aid it says protease inhibitors inhibit HIV-1 protease which cleaves polypeptide products of HIV mRNA into their functional parts; proteases are responsible for cleaving and processing proteins made from HIV RNA transcript into functional parts and protease inhibits this process by inhibiting proteases responsible for processing proteins that are made from HIV mRNA+1
pakimdon pg 203 of first aid it says protease inhibitors inhibit HIV-1 protease which cleaves polypeptide products of HIV mRNA into their functional parts; proteases are responsible for cleaving and processing proteins made from HIV RNA transcript into functional parts and protease inhibits this process by inhibiting proteases responsible for processing proteins that are made from HIV mRNA+
pakimdand then those functional proteins are assembled and packaged into virions to be released and infect other T cells+
pakimdif you look at the illustration on pg 201 of FA youll see that they say that protease inhibitors inhibit proteolytic processing+1
cheesetouchin a UW question I did, it said that protease inhibitors inhibit gag-pol cleavage, which would probably be considered a form of processing.
gag -> p24 capsid and p17 matrix proteins
pol -> reverse txase, aspartate protease, integrase
pakimd makes a great point above about the img on 201. I think this is just kind of a crappy question LOL+
submitted by โcassdawg(1780)
The -navirs are protease inhibitors, so a mutation in protein processing would cause resistance.