need help with your account or subscription? click here to email us (or see the contact page)
join telegramNEW! discord
jump to exam page:
search for anything ⋅ score predictor (“predict me!”)

You must be logged in to vote!
Retired NBME 24 Answers

nbme24/Block 2/Question#47 (reveal difficulty score)
A 73-year-old man has an incurable malignant ...
Both legal and ethical 🔍 / 📺 / 🌳 / 📖
tags: ethics

 Login (or register) to see more


 +6  upvote downvote
submitted by m-ice(370)
get full access to all contentpick a username

The most important ethical principle that supersedes all others is autonomy. From an ethical standpoint, this patient has the right to refuse further treatment as he is mentally competent, in this case in the form of having the respiratory removed. From a legal standpoint, the physician is allowed to discontinue treatment for a patient if that is what the patient wants. This is different from situations of physician assisted suicide, which is more complicated and has variable ethics and legality.

get full access to all contentpick a username
johnson  No - treatment is being withdrawn per the mentally competent patient's wishes. m-ice explained it well. +4
johnson  No - treatment is being withdrawn per the mentally competent patient's wishes. m-ice explained it well. +1
johnson  No - treatment is being withdrawn per the mentally competent patient's wishes. m-ice explained it well. +1
proteinbound123  In Physician-Assisted Suicide, the patient should be deemed “terminally ill” and “mentally competent” (by 2 different doctors) with less than 6 months to live (with or without treatment), he requests (written request, done twice, 15 -day interval) assistance to die and the doctor prescribes a lethal dose of a medication for the patient. If, in the meantime, the patient develops a life-threatening acute problem and requests the doctor to withhold or withdraw treatment, by the Principle of Autonomy the doctor should proceed as the patient wants. In fact, by the Principle of Autonomy, any competent patient has a right to refuse treatment. This concept is supported not only by the ethical principle of autonomy but also by U.S. statutes, regulations and case law. Competent adults can refuse care even if the care would likely save or prolong the patient's life. +2

And here I was thinking about whether it was ethical for the physician to discuss the matter with the children smh

+1/- smpate(20)

You must be logged in to vote!

 +0  upvote downvote
submitted by madamestep(17)
get full access to all contentpick a username

Patients are allowed to let themselves die. You're just not allowed to kill anyone (murder).

get full access to all contentpick a username
madamestep  Although: They aren't allowed to let themselves die if the only reason they give is they want to commit suicide! Here the patient wants to ed suffering, which is logical. It's not: I'm depressed and want to end my life. +


You must be logged in to vote!

Must-See Comments from nbme24

seagull on Intestinal mucosa
tissue creep on Ask the roommate not to smoke in the apartment
drdoom on Adenosine
seagull on Increased serum testosterone concentration
atstillisafraud on Lamins
niboonsh on Only cookies are independently associated ...
atstillisafraud on Scar formation
lamhtu on Decreased adherence
drachenx on Damage to the rectovaginal septum
drdoom on Intestinal mucosa
azibird on Coronavirus
lsmarshall on Organic acid metabolism disorder
sympathetikey on Inhalant abuse
tea-cats-biscuits on Eosinophils

search for anything NEW!