support the site ⋅ become a member ⋅ unscramble the egg
free120  nbme24  nbme23  nbme22  nbme21  nbme20  nbme19  nbme18  nbme17  nbme16  nbme15  nbme13 

NBME Answers

free120/Block 3/Question#26 (5.6 difficulty score)
A new test to detect the presence of malarial ...

Login to comment/vote.

unscramble the site ⋅ become a member ($36/month)

ctSpiyfeici si hwo feton royu stet is itgrh tbuoa leeopp owtiuht eth ie:sesad

= NT / (TN + )FP
= 59 / )(95+5
= %95

drdoom  Put another way: Of all the people who are disease-free, how many (of those people) did you catch? In this case, there are 100 people who are disease-free; our test labeled 95 of those people as “disease-free”, but our test also called 5 of those people “positive”; so our test is good (sort of) but not that good. +1  
drdoom  Also note how specificity only answers questions about people WITHOUT THE DISEASE; it only “deals with” people who are disease-free. (Sensitivity is the opposite: it is a formula which only deals with people WITH THE DISEASE. I think understanding that is better than coming up with some crazy Snout-Spout-Spin mnemonic, which I never remember anyway.) +