Welcome to step1forthewin’s page.
Contributor score: 2
Comments ...
xxabi
I'm not completely sure...but I think its because its aspirin, and aspirin doesn't work on IIb/IIIa receptors. That's why i picked decreased adherence of platelets, figured that was the closest thing to decreased aggregation that still made sense with aspirin's mechanism of action. Hope that helps!
+2
ihavenolife
Aspirin irreversibly inhibits COX which leads to decreased TXA2. TXA2 normally is a vasoconstrictor and induces platelet aggregation, so aspirin inhibits platelet aggregation by downplaying TXA2 not by interacting with IIb/IIIa receptor. (Source FA and UWorld)
+22
niboonsh
inhibition of IIb/IIIa receptor is the moa of a completely separate class of drugs - Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa (abciximab, eptifabide, tirofiban)
+1
t123
Bad question - TXA2 upregulates GpIIb/IIIa on platelets. So aspirin inhibits their expression.
+1
Subcomments ...
drdoom
be kind to yourself, doc! (it's a long road we're on!)
+21
step1forthewin
Hi, can someone explain the blood smear? isn't it supposed to show hypersegmented neutrophils if it was B12 deficiency?
+1
loftybirdman
I think the blood smear is showing a lone lymphocyte, which should be the same size as a normal RBC. You can see the RBCs in this smear are bigger than that ->macrocytic ->B12 deficiency
+25
seagull
maybe i'm new to the game. but isn't the answer folate deficiency and not B12? Also, i though it was anemia of chronic disease as well.
+
vshummy
Lispectedwumbologist, please explain your mistake? Lol because that seems like a respectible answer to me...
+9
gonyyong
It's a B12 deficiency
Ileum is where B12 is reabsorbed, folate is jejunum
The blood smear is showing enlarged RBCs
Methionine synthase does this conversion, using cofactor B12
+2
uslme123
Anemia of chronic disease is a microcytic anemia -- I believe this is why they put a lymphocyte on the side -- so we could see that it was a macrocytic anemia.
+4
yotsubato
Thanks NBME, that really helped me....
+1
keshvi
the question was relatively easy, but the picture was so misguiding i felt! i thought it looked like microcytic RBCs. I guess the key is, that they clearly mentioned distal ileum. and that is THE site for B12 absorption.
+6
sahusema
I didn't even register that was a lymphocyte. I thought I was seeing target cells so I was confused AF
+
drschmoctor
Leave it to NBME to find the palest macrocytes on the planet.
+5
zevvyt
so i guess size is more important than color cause those are hypochromatic as fuck
+
yesa
The NUCLEUS of a lymphocyte should be the same size as a normal RBC, which is not the case here. Under normal circumstances RBCs are not as big as lymphocytes, so this is truly extraordinary = megaloblastic anemia.
+1
weirdmed51
@yesa you mean ‘macrocytic’. For it to be ‘megaloblastic’ there had to be a hypersegmented neutrophil.
+
Can someone please clarify the answer. Is decreased adherence same as decreased aggregation? Wouldn;t inhibition of the IIb/IIIa receptor prevent aggregation?