need help with your account or subscription? click here to email us (or see the contact page)
join telegramNEW! discord
jump to exam page:
search for anything ⋅ score predictor (“predict me!”)

Welcome to cjdinurdreamz’s page.
Contributor score: 0


Comments ...




Subcomments ...

submitted by b1ackcoffee(115), visit this page
get full access to all contentbecome a member

I thought regarding this question as HLA gene distribution (en block).

Even if we discard everything and just think about the last sentence (question), for any gene, chance of sibling having exact same allele is 25%

suppose there are 4 alleles for a gene in parents, A,a, B, and b (what I mean to say is all 4 are different in both parents).

Now suppose one daughter has aB genotype. To have exact same alleles, other daughter must have

50% chance of a (among a and A from mother) multiplied by 50% chance of B (among b and B from father)

combined probability for any gene would be 25%.

Please, point out any fault in the reasoning.

get full access to all contentbecome a member
cjdinurdreamz  i used the same exact reasoning +
skonys  Suffering from success over here because I just read it as there one locus "6*" and shes homozygous aa. Thus her sisters has a 25% chance of being aa too because punnet square. Most probably the wrong logic but hey, we out here. +


submitted by dr_jan_itor(87), visit this page
get full access to all contentbecome a member

Option A is the only option where both muscles are part of the orbital floor. Also, the last sentence in the question stem is a total modifyer of what one would expect the question to be asking. It is not asking for you to assume that these muscles have been severed, paralyzed, or rendered flacid. It is asking you to assume that they have become "entrapped" if the muscle is entrapped, then it cannot allow the eye to move into whatever position it would be in when the muscle is at its lengthened position. So in this case, It is the inferior rectus being entrapped in a functionally shortened position that is preventing upward gaze.

get full access to all contentbecome a member
cjdinurdreamz  im confused...doesnt the IR make the eye look down so if its trapped then why is upward gaze affected and not downward? +
nutmeg_liver  @cjdinurdreamz it does make your eye look down, so since it's trapped in a functionally shorter position you're trapped looking down, not up. +5


search for anything NEW!