You must be logged in to vote!
wishmewell
NVM! i read the question again. The patient has visited already 4 times with cheif complains regarding sexual organs in a short period of time. According to FA page 262 (2018) at this point a chaperone should be added, if this doesnt help then the patient needs to be forwarded to another physician.
+5
groovygrinch
Can someone explain why " Tell the patient that it is common for patients to fantasize about their physicians" is wrong?
+7
mumenrider4ever
@groovygrinch I don't think it's normal for patients to have sexual fantasies about their physicians lol
+20
jurrutia
Switching to a neutral subject doesn't "address the problem". Never refer, always address the problem.
+3
jbrito718
a 35 year old with a chaperrone doesnt sound right to me. but nothing in NBME sounds right. I really hope step isnt this retarded
+
neurotic999
I was between chaperone and switching to neutral topic. With the chaperone I somehow felt it was against the patient's privacy and shi*. lol.
+
leonelgonzalezdiaz
look at the chief complaint, it is pretty obvious why she is there when you add the rest of the information, you need a chaperone.
+
You must be logged in to vote!
You must be logged in to vote!
submitted by โwishmewell(59)
In my opinion this is kinda rude as an intial action. if the person continues to go back to the topic, I would say having a chaperone would help.... idk why Interrupting the patient with a more neurtal topic isnt the answer