welcome redditors!to snoo-finity ... and beyond!
Welcome to mellowpenguins's page.
Contributor score: 0
School:


Comments ...




Subcomments ...

submitted by yotsubato(312),

Was it just me, or did "age at onset in years" appear RIGHT above the number of patients, rather than the mean. Which confused me for a good 3 minutes.

fulminant_life  Definitely was the same for me. I was so confused for like 5 mins +5  
d_holles  dude i almost didn't get the question bc of this ... i thought the age of onset was the actual age of onset (36) +3  
mellowpenguins  Are you serious. NBME strikes again with shitty formatting. +  
yex  OMG!! Now I just realized that. Super confused and also thought onset of age was 36. :-/ +1  
monkey  what is 36 supposed to be? +  
thomasburton  Think the number of people in that group +1  
paulkarr  Yup...was looking at it for a good 3 min before just doing the "fuck it..it's gotta be 99" +