need help with your account or subscription? click here to email us (or see the contact page)
join telegramNEW! discord
jump to exam page:
search for anything ⋅ score predictor (โ€œpredict me!โ€)

NBME 21 Answers

nbme21/Block 1/Question#47 (reveal difficulty score)
A 26-year-old woman (III-2) comes to the ...
50% in females but near 0 in males ๐Ÿ” / ๐Ÿ“บ / ๐ŸŒณ / ๐Ÿ“–
tags: genetics pedigree

 Login (or register) to see more


 +18  upvote downvote
submitted by โˆ—drmantistoboggan4(18)
get full access to all contentpick a username

It said it was fatal to males in utero, and the question asked about live born offspring. Since the males arenโ€™t being born in the first place, I said 50% females and 0% males.

get full access to all contentpick a username
hungrybox  fuck i got baited +37
jcrll  "live-born offspring" โ† baited +29
sympathetikey  Same :/ +
arkmoses  smh +
niboonsh  why is it 50% females tho? +2
imgdoc  felt like an idiot after i figured out why i got this wrong. +3
temmy  oh shit! +
suckitnbme  This isn't exactly right as males can still be born as evidenced by individuals III 6,9,11. This basically an x-linked recessive disease. A carrier mother can still pass her normal X chromosome to a son (50% chance). It's just that the other 50% chance of passing an affected X chromosome results in death of the fetus in utero. Thus all males actually born will not be affected. +6
makinallkindzofgainz  @suckitnbme, Correct, but if you're a live-born male, you 100% for sure do NOT have the disease, so the chance of a live-born male "being affected" is 0. +8
spow  @suckitnbme it's not X-linked recessive, otherwise every single son would be affected and therefore have died in utero. It's X-linked dominant +5
qball  Jail-baited +
srmtn  correct @spow affected females= X linked Dominant +



 +8  upvote downvote
submitted by โˆ—nwinkelmann(366)
get full access to all contentpick a username

Pedigree = XLD (not all generations affected = X-linked, affects males and females similarly = dominant).

Affected fathers = 100% transmission to daughters, 0% transmission to sons.
Affected mothers = 50% to daughters, 50% transmission to sons. Both parents affected = 100% transmission to daughters (due to father's X chromosome), 50% transmission to sons (due to mother's X chromosome). Both parents affected each transmitting both to daughter (homozygous daughter) = 50% and more severe.

If condition is uniformly fatal to males in utero, then the 50% affected based on transmision (as above) will die in utero, and the 50% not affected will have live births. This means, risk of female being affected = 50% and risk of live-born males being affected = 0%.

get full access to all contentpick a username
divakhan  I believe its not XLD, had it been there would still be 25% chance of males to be normal according to the Punnett square. (FA 2020 Page 59. +
divakhan  ^ 50% chance of being normal.. which is NOT in the answer, it said 0% chance in males! +
divakhan  Plus you'd see disease in EVERY generation if it was Dominant. For it to be XLD, the father I,1 would have transmitted it to his daughter. Instead the parents are carrier in Gen I. so its XLR disease (II, 3 being a homozygous XLR female) +
plzhelp123  This is X-linked dominant (think Rett syndrome), if it were x-linked recessive, a female would need to have 2 affected x chromosomes to be symptomatic, which would mean her father would HAVE to be symptomatic as he has only one X chromosome, which is impossible as he would have perished in-utero. The reason the answer is 0 in males is because the question asks specifically about live-born males. If it had asked what is the risk of the fetus being affected then it would be 50% in males (but that 50% would not survive to birth) +2
unknown001  my recommendation, avoid trying to figure out wether its x linked dominant or recessive, as doing so will not help in getting to the point of the question. +1



 +2  upvote downvote
submitted by โˆ—ragacha(17)
get full access to all contentpick a username

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incontinentia_pigmenti

get full access to all contentpick a username



 +0  upvote downvote
submitted by tsp(0)
get full access to all contentpick a username

Is the woman in the first generation 1(2) not affected because of incomplete penetrance?1(2) has to have the trait for the disease to develop in the future generation.

get full access to all contentpick a username
b1ackcoffee  disease developed due to germline mosaicism (mutation in of the oocyte) +



 +0  upvote downvote
submitted by โˆ—adong(144)
get full access to all contentpick a username

I knew it had to be X-linked because it said that it was fatal to males who have it in utero, but I had a hard time deciding between dominant and recessive. Ultimately it has to be X-linked dominant because the affected mother in the second generation gave birth to unaffected sons (which can't happen in X-linked recessive). That means the mother in question is heterozygous and her daughters will have a 50% chance of inheriting the disease while her sons have to be unaffected if they live, as previous posters mentioned. I didn't figure this out until way after the test...this one was a doozy. Still not sure that it's XLD because how come nobody in the first gen has it? Guessing it was a spontaneous mutation?

get full access to all contentpick a username



 -1  upvote downvote
submitted by โˆ—an_improved_me(91)
get full access to all contentpick a username

Honest question: Why does it matter what pattern of inheritance it has? For all we know, its multi-factorial/can't be determined.

I feel like the easiest way to answer it is: acknowledging it is "uniformly fatal to males in-utero" = 0% chance for males; and legit just counting the fraction of females in generation III that have the disease = 4/6 ~50%.

get full access to all contentpick a username



 -4  upvote downvote
submitted by โˆ—divakhan(18)
get full access to all contentpick a username
This is not XLD, its XLR disease (FA 2020 page 59)

Here, the mother is homozygous for the mutation therefore she displays the disease.

We see that,

  1. It skips generations
  2. Males are more severely affected (die in utero)
  3. Females are affected (only when homozygous)

Here we see, that mother can pass defective X chromosome to 50% females & other 50% will be carriers (healthy X chromosome from father, defective from mother) For males, Mother passes defective X chromosome so they die (only 1 X chromosome)

For the males who are living (III 6,11 shown in pedigree), they have been lucky to survive due to mosaicism! ;)

get full access to all contentpick a username
b1ackcoffee  don't you think you are going through too many hoops (assumptions)? male survive due to mosaicism? Better chance is disease started due to germline mosaicism and it IS XLD. btw the disease is incontinentia pigmenti (not necessary to know). your second last para doesn't make sense, read again with fresh mind and perspective. +1
malienca  i answered the question like divakhan and it came out right. it looks more like a XLR +



Must-See Comments from nbme21

nosancuck on Absorption atelectasis
assoplasty on Free T4
seagull on GM2
lnsetick on Apocrine
niboonsh on NMDA receptors are blocked by Mg2+ at the ...
drdoom on Deletion of a hydrophobic amino acid ...
hayayah on HCO3โˆ’ transported in the plasma
mcl on Aortic
notadoctor on Usual interstitial pneumonitis
madojo on Genital herpes
hungrybox on Obstruction of the bile duct
jambo2222 on Lung
hungrybox on Mismatch repair
hungrybox on Hydrochlorothiazide

search for anything NEW!