share email twitter ⋅ join discord whatsapp(2ck)
free120  nbme24  nbme23  nbme22  nbme21  nbme20  nbme19  nbme18  nbme17  nbme16  nbme15  nbme13 
Welcome to taway’s page.
Contributor score: 29


Comments ...

 +1  (nbme21#8)
unscramble the site ⋅ remove ads ⋅ become a member ($39/month)

Dose odynbay enasntddru ywh ew are ewadlol to feinterer wiht teh lclncaii dsniakioincmeg fo tow othre ieltspsisca iyctlder? dtn'oWlu tath uddmy het rsawet enve more by adgind uor pinonoi? I ot'dn see het ruinlgenyd nrcppliei ttah saxelpni hte iealrtoan in thsi wn.arse

jcrll  I think it's about adding our opinion and more about seeing what the situation is because a patient contacted you in distress. The others are about contacting management off hearsay; that could also "muddy the waters," I Is this question also addressing quaternary prevention? +1
meningitis  I agree with jcrll. My same thought process but then I changed it to psychiatric consultation in order to first attend the patient's distress and anxiety since it was hindering her decision making. Besides, the whole ordeal about her treatments and ineffectiveness was emotionally and physically exhausting her. +2
vi_capsule  Referral is NEVER a answer +10
tsl19  Going straight to the chair of the ethics committee without having spoken to the other physicians would be inappropriate because it would be jumping a bunch of steps in communication first - like jcrll said, you want to get the picture of what's going on from the other physicians first. Maybe the gynecologic oncologist isn't actually as opposed to palliative measures as the patient perceives him to be and thinks he's doing what the patient wants, etc. It could just be miscommunication, which you could help clear up without getting ethics involved ... better to start there. +10

 +7  (nbme21#39)
unscramble the site ⋅ remove ads ⋅ become a member ($39/month)

uJts sa a eton fro ybdonya lsee how saw TWF ta how ()323/320(09)0/ = ..1a/1.5 olt fo toqnseui asbkn orudn 309/2 r(o nya imlyiarsl agelr to)ricfan otu to 1

gh889  I think you meant 2(29/30)(1/30) just to clarify! +7
niboonsh  i am confusion +2
arkmoses  You have to use the hardy weinberg formula (1=p^2+2qp+q^2)and p + q = 1 they basically tell you that q^2=1/900 which makes q=1/30 now you can figure out (p=1-q) so p=1-(1/30), p=29/30 then to figure out carrier you solve for 2qp, 2(29/30)(1/30)=1/15 I got it wrong cuz I forgot how to figure out p but hopefully wont happen on the real deal. +5
garibay92  2pq= 2(29/30)(1/30).... Transform this to 2 1 1 2 1 x x = _ = ____ 1 1 30 30 15 +
garibay92  Nevermind :/ It didn't come out as planned :( +
garibay92  /Users/carlosgutierrez/Desktop/IMG_2423.jpg +
pg32  How do we know this disease is autosomal recessive? I assumed it was just because they love these carrier frequency questions with AR diseases, but how do we know it's AR? +
turtlepenlight  Sounds like Gaucher (ish?) if i'm remembering correctly +5

 +21  (nbme21#14)
unscramble the site ⋅ remove ads ⋅ become a member ($39/month)

ishT qeitsnou si eadhrsp eagnys,ltr tbu its' leeltsyiasn skagni "atwh udowl nepahp if tihs nwom'as dpostrimyyohih baceem ulnlredoctno orve hte orseuc fo rhe "?pcneangry

lrtrcenuy rhe TSH si odog t--;&g ldtooelln-lrwec hTpTYHyoid oOEHmIhPyrLAsCit ighh HST &tg;-- her riypodhyhsotim tums TNO eb oo-lelncltdelrw e(ud ot rsinopuitd of het /4/3TR/THHTTS neodinrce )iaxs

o,S now tath ew danetnruds htta hte tonuseqi is nksagi "htwa lwoud panhep if hre sprodmyihhtyoi asw n?drcoolet"unl

Asewrn: semicirnt

I nhikt taht tshi nieusqto si daphesr ooatysliruc, tub fra eb it orfm em ot zcriiecti het SMLEU eiingclns d.oa..rb

yotsubato  I think that this question is phrased atrociously, Just like the rest of the NBME +17
b1ackcoffee  exactly how does maternal hashimoto can cause cretinism? +
notyasupreme  @b1ackcoffee, it's not maternal hashimoto, basically you just have to disregard the ENTIRE question stem and the last part of the sentence (if the mom's TSH goes up) means that there's hypothyroidism going on, which causes cretinism. +1
b1ackcoffee  Thanks you @notyasupreme! +




Subcomments ...