Welcome to sunny’s page.
Contributor score: 4
Comments ...
krewfoo99
I think its neutrophils because they mention myelosupression and rapidly dividing cells.
+2
wishmewell
Ya, Neutrophils, basophils, macrophages, eosinophils are considered Myeloid cells. While the rest of the T cells are from the Lymphoid lineage, The Immunoglobulins come from B cells ( lymphoid lineage).
+7
cuthbertallg0od
Myelosuppression refers to bone marrow suppression as a whole, including lymphocytes. I got it wrong too and no clue why its neutrophils, but I don't think that's why
+
cuthbertallg0od
Maybe they're looking for us to pick "losing innate immunity" (maybe worse than losing adaptive?), which wouldn't refer to complement here since the problem isn't in the liver
+
scrambledeggs
FA2020 p.424
Neutropenia: Absolute neutrophil count < 1500 cells/mm3.
Severe infections typical when < 500 cells/mm3.
Causes: Sepsis/postinfection, drugs (including chemotherapy), aplastic anemia, SLE,
radiation
+1
kmichaels
Pretty sure the idea is that it's just the fact that you classical follow neutrophils. All cytotoxic T-cell activity is talking about ACTIVITY not counts. NK cells we just don't really measure those I think haha
+1
drdoom
As Aristotle once quipped, “A ‘single-point in time’ doth not a cross-sectional study make.” The design of a cross-sectional study would not define “ahead of time” two cohorts (two groups); said another way, a cross-sectional design would not “split people into two groups.” In the design of a cross-sectional study there is only “one group”, and then you ask all members of that group some question (“Do you have asthma?”). At the end of a cross-sectional study, the authors will be able to make a statement like this: “We called 10,000 phone numbers with area code 415 at random and asked ‘Do you take Drug X?’ 500 responded ‘I don’t know’, 633 responded ‘Yes’, and 8,867 responded ’No’.”
+16
castlblack
That is interesting. I think the question is phrased ambiguously. I interpreted the question stem to say that they called random people and sorted them into hemorrhagic stroke pts vs controls after the fact using an ORAL questionnaire. Therefore the question would be " Did you have a stroke?" Yes = 702 or no = 1376. And thus would be a cross-sectional study.
I see now that the questionnaire must be paper and contacted from some unstated list of drug X recipients.
+
ergogenic22
because then it is as if you are paying the patient to enroll in the experimental treatment
+
ergogenic22
because then it is as if you are paying the patient to enroll in the experimental treatment, which I don't know why that would be wrong
+
dubywow
Bribery is only good for doctors. Can't bribe patients. That's illegal. Kind of like how NCAA gets paid a lot, but student athletes get nadda. Still the TLDR is it always ethical to disclose financial incentives when they relate to anything that may affect your decision on how to treat a patient.
+2
Subcomments ...
sunny
Also it(blockers) hides signs of hypoglycemia which are tremors.
+3 2020-02-29T14:06:48Z
sunny
i think C is type III
+2 2019-08-03T05:37:03Z
sunny
i think C is type III
+ 2019-08-03T05:37:03Z
dentist
In Type III HS, First C happens then then D happens
+ 2020-01-23T14:07:57Z
sunny
i think C is type III
+2 2019-08-03T05:37:03Z
sunny
i think C is type III
+ 2019-08-03T05:37:03Z
dentist
In Type III HS, First C happens then then D happens
+ 2020-01-23T14:07:57Z
https://www.google.com/search?q=LAMIN&tbm=isch&q:lamin,g_1:nuclear+envelope