share email twitter ⋅ join discord whatsapp(2ck)
Free 120  NBME 24  NBME 23  NBME 22  NBME 21  NBME 20  NBME 19  NBME 18  NBME 17  NBME 16  NBME 15  NBME 13 
introducing : the “predict me” score predictor NEW!
Welcome to sunny’s page.
Contributor score: 4


Comments ...


 +1  (nbme18#18)
unscramble the site ⋅ remove ads ⋅ become a member ($39/month)

ywh si tshi os //i wnko its sacbi tub ll.sit..??

krewfoo99  I think its neutrophils because they mention myelosupression and rapidly dividing cells. +2
wishmewell  Ya, Neutrophils, basophils, macrophages, eosinophils are considered Myeloid cells. While the rest of the T cells are from the Lymphoid lineage, The Immunoglobulins come from B cells ( lymphoid lineage). +7
cuthbertallg0od  Myelosuppression refers to bone marrow suppression as a whole, including lymphocytes. I got it wrong too and no clue why its neutrophils, but I don't think that's why +
cuthbertallg0od  Maybe they're looking for us to pick "losing innate immunity" (maybe worse than losing adaptive?), which wouldn't refer to complement here since the problem isn't in the liver +
scrambledeggs  FA2020 p.424 Neutropenia: Absolute neutrophil count < 1500 cells/mm3. Severe infections typical when < 500 cells/mm3. Causes: Sepsis/postinfection, drugs (including chemotherapy), aplastic anemia, SLE, radiation +1
kmichaels  Pretty sure the idea is that it's just the fact that you classical follow neutrophils. All cytotoxic T-cell activity is talking about ACTIVITY not counts. NK cells we just don't really measure those I think haha +1

 -6  (nbme22#49)
unscramble the site ⋅ remove ads ⋅ become a member ($39/month)

FA pg 508 1()9 pmpt easucs ..a..............p..k................r......i....s.n.....

mkreamy  ...... +4

 +4  (nbme22#34)
unscramble the site ⋅ remove ads ⋅ become a member ($39/month)

yhw si hits ont a sscor taosiecln ?ysvuer ... ncsei we rae ksngai at a arctiarulp imet

drdoom  As Aristotle once quipped, “A ‘single-point in time’ doth not a cross-sectional study make.” The design of a cross-sectional study would not define “ahead of time” two cohorts (two groups); said another way, a cross-sectional design would not “split people into two groups.” In the design of a cross-sectional study there is only “one group”, and then you ask all members of that group some question (“Do you have asthma?”). At the end of a cross-sectional study, the authors will be able to make a statement like this: “We called 10,000 phone numbers with area code 415 at random and asked ‘Do you take Drug X?’ 500 responded ‘I don’t know’, 633 responded ‘Yes’, and 8,867 responded ’No’.” +16
castlblack  That is interesting. I think the question is phrased ambiguously. I interpreted the question stem to say that they called random people and sorted them into hemorrhagic stroke pts vs controls after the fact using an ORAL questionnaire. Therefore the question would be " Did you have a stroke?" Yes = 702 or no = 1376. And thus would be a cross-sectional study. I see now that the questionnaire must be paper and contacted from some unstated list of drug X recipients. +

 +0  (nbme22#10)
unscramble the site ⋅ remove ads ⋅ become a member ($39/month)

HWY TON Sna,YEd tehn ehsar het nemoy ihtw eth yeipnta os he etnsdo' tobud uyro imes.ovt

ergogenic22  because then it is as if you are paying the patient to enroll in the experimental treatment +
ergogenic22  because then it is as if you are paying the patient to enroll in the experimental treatment, which I don't know why that would be wrong +
dubywow  Bribery is only good for doctors. Can't bribe patients. That's illegal. Kind of like how NCAA gets paid a lot, but student athletes get nadda. Still the TLDR is it always ethical to disclose financial incentives when they relate to anything that may affect your decision on how to treat a patient. +2




Subcomments ...

submitted by medpsychosis(113),
unscramble the site ⋅ remove ads ⋅ become a member ($39/month)

The awy I ughttho batuo ti was a letilt reom iimtsilp.cs We ues nno etelcisev abte kscblroe .e(.g nrproPol)oal for teh eatntmert fo ealseistn otmrr.e efrTreohe a atbe aintsog owdlu vhae eht eostopip e,ecfft aak uacse or aeenhnc emt.ror

hungrybox  Genius +3  
sunny  Also it(blockers) hides signs of hypoglycemia which are tremors. +3  


unscramble the site ⋅ remove ads ⋅ become a member ($39/month)

udlow yeaonn be lbea ot lcrayif hwta teh ehrtso ulodw b?Ae ) eelgrAnl ddmiaeet ontsnr,tsovicaico lgdniae ot ecismcih eutiss r:jinuy Tepy )BI indinBg of naengit ot IEg on eht acusfre of stam selcl danlegi ot tsam clle rnlaeaginudt:o Teyp )C I denpooiits of bnyntagtdea-iion seecxlopm wnihit porlpsyaicalt sve,lneu andgeli ot ticatvnioa of cnmopetlem: Nto rusDe ) sPacgsohytoi fo neniatg yb roptuh,elins gidalen ot aidxont ieedtdma estsui mdaega: Type ?III

sunny  i think C is type III +2  
sunny  i think C is type III +  
dentist  In Type III HS, First C happens then then D happens +  


unscramble the site ⋅ remove ads ⋅ become a member ($39/month)

ludwo yenona be leba to cryilfa wtha the steroh dluwo beA?) rAlelneg etdmedai ssnvcrtoino,tcaoi aiedlgn to mcihseic essuit uji:ynr epTy BI) idBgnni fo tignena to IEg no the sacerfu fo tsma lclse igaelnd ot mats lelc nauadgtnero:li peTy I)C iitnopdseo of y-idantenignbato oceeslxmp ihwtin lrsoplctaaipy sueveln, einlgda to ioiavcantt fo nl:ompeemtc Not s)erDu shtosoiPcyag fo tneaign by epnrious,htl delagin ot ontxida emtiedda issuet aad:gem eTpy III?

sunny  i think C is type III +2  
sunny  i think C is type III +  
dentist  In Type III HS, First C happens then then D happens +